for readable text.When interviewed by the Star reporter only a few points of mine were 'quoted' in the article, what was left out was my response to the council and pool patrons concerns over vandalism and privacy. They believe the fence needs to be that high as well as having the barbed wire, and that the wire may be removed if no further vandilism occurs. Fact is the fence at this boundary is probably the hardest way to get into the pool complex. Much easier acess is by straddling the small fence by the Cafe and walking over the rocks and then hopping over the other small fence you are right in the pool area.
Why, if a fence such as the one being replaced, is needed for security is there such a flimsy and easily jumped fence used for the rest of the perimiter?
0 Response to "In the Star - Seconds fence replacement"
Posting Komentar